Obeying your conscience

Do you think there could come a time when there is wholesale persecution of Christians in this country? Only God knows the future but, when you think about what happened in Germany, a country with a long tradition of religious tolerance, under Hitler’s Nazism you may start to be a bit concerned. If that sort of oppression should ever happen here then Christians will need a firm grasp on their beliefs and convictions. Much will turn on our consciences and the way we understand God’s Word and perceive the leading of the Holy Spirit. The following article by Pastor Bob Russell addresses the issue in a way that rings true to me. I wonder if you will agree with him. Pastor Russell’s article appeared as: When is it right to disobey the Law? at: BobRussell.org.  Incidentally, I have signed the Manhattan Declaration mentioned in the article.  You can read it, and possibly sign it, HERE.  RMF


Bob Russell

Bob Russell

When is it right to disobey the law?
by Bob Russell

I admire the courage of Kim Davis, the Rowan County clerk who has stubbornly refused to grant same-sex marriage licenses in her district. She stated to do so would be to disobey God’s authority. For her, it was a choice between heaven and hell. Gubernatorial candidate Matt Bevin stated he was “absolutely” standing by Mrs. Davis and pointed out she has every right to exercise her first amendment rights – the free exercise of religion.

Bible in Chains  This past Thursday District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Kim Davis imprisoned – which was not exactly a commensurate penalty for her offense.* That prompted former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee to tweet, “Kim Davis in Federal Custody removes all doubts about the criminalization of Christianity in this country.”

Kim Davis knows the Bible clearly states that marriage is to be between a man and a woman. She believes her name on the license would indicate her endorsement of what God’s Word labels a perversion. Therefore she had three choices: (a) She could refuse to issue a marriage license to same sex couples, (b) she could comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling and violate her conscience or (c) she could resign her position as County Clerk. She chose the first option knowing full well her refusal would create a significant stir. 

What would you do? That question may be more relevant for you in the near future than you imagine right now. As our culture becomes increasingly intolerant of the basic principles of the Christian faith, someday soon you may be called upon to make a choice between obeying God’s Word and obeying man’s law.

What about this? Would you support conscientious objection in this situation?

What about this? Would you support conscientious objection in this situation?

The Bible plainly teaches that believers are to be submissive to the government authorities over us. (See Romans 13:1.) On the other hand there are several examples in Scripture of individuals who received God’s approval for disobeying a man-made law that was in direct opposition to His will. The Hebrew midwives who refused to kill the firstborn Israelite male babies, Moses’ parents who defied Pharaoh’s order to kill their newborn son, Daniel who disobeyed the King’s edict not to pray, the three Hebrews who refused to bow down to the king’s image are all Old Testament examples that come to mind. In the New Testament when Peter and John were ordered by the Jerusalem authorities not to preach publicly in the name of Jesus they responded, “We must obey God, not man. We can’t help but speak about what we’ve seen and heard.”

When is civil disobedience appropriate? That’s a question God’s people have wrestled with from the days of the Israelite slavery in Egypt to Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement in America. Here are several guidelines that help determine when and how Christians are to disobey human laws.

1. The legal order must be in direct violation of God’s Word. We have no right to disobey laws because we think they are illogical or unfair. But if a human law directly contradicts a Divine command we have a right and a responsibility to obey God first.

2. The objector’s life should be above reproach. Civil disobedience turns the spotlight on the conscientious objector, so there needs to be a consistent Christian life backing it up. The pacifist who refuses to go to war shouldn’t have a recent police record of being arrested in bar fights. Critics of Kim Davis have been quick to point out that she has been married four times. That doesn’t help her cause. But in fairness, she didn’t become a Christian until four years ago. (I’m convicted that she’s gained more courage in four years than some of us have in forty!) No one is perfect but the spotlight shouldn’t reveal rank hypocrisy.

3. The objection is communicated clearly to the proper authorities. When Daniel learned of the king’s edict not to pray, he prayed at an open window so his defiance of the law was evident to all. Peter and John declared openly to the Jerusalem authorities, “We must obey God, not man.” It should be obvious to all why we are disobeying to the law.

4. The objector is non-violent and acts with respect and courtesy toward those who disagree. Civil disobedience is not a call to violence or an excuse to engage in shouting contests. When the Jerusalem authorities saw the courage of Peter and John, “… they took note of them that they had been with Jesus.” The disciples didn’t deliberately antagonize. They calmly stated their objection and stood their ground, reflecting the spirit of Jesus.

5. There is a willingness to accept the consequences administered by the government. The Christian shouldn’t refuse to pay the fine, resist arrest or whine about imprisonment. Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego knew that by refusing to worship the king’s image they were destined to be thrown into a fiery furnace. But they told King Nebuchadnezzar, “… we do not need to defend ourselves before you in this mater. If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God we serve is able to deliver us from it…But even if he does not, we want you to know, Your Majesty, that we will not serve your gods or worship the image of gold you have set up” (Daniel 3:16-18).

A few years ago I signed “The Manhattan Declaration” along with over half a million Christian leaders. It was a call to conscience that issued a notice to our nation’s governing authorities that we would stand for life, for marriage and for religious freedom regardless of the consequences.

The final paragraph reads, “Because we honor justice and the common good, we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family. We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God’s.”

In 1846 Henry David Thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay a poll tax that he objected to. When Ralph Waldo Emerson saw him behind bars he asked, “Henry, what are you doing in there?” Thoreau is purported to have answered, “Waldo, the question is: What are you doing out there?”

In light of the imprisonment of Kim Davis maybe that same telling question should dig at our conscience. Maybe we should be asking, not why Kim Davis is in prison, but why we aren’t morally outraged at our government and doing something about it?

* For further reading: Check out this article to see the inconsistency of the response to Kim Davis’ civil disobedience to that of gubernatorial candidate Jack Conway’s refusal to defend the law.


About ronfurg

Former naval officer, federal investigator, forensic scientist, senior executive service member and pastor. In retirement serves as volunteer and life group leader at New Life Christian Church (www.newlife4me.com). Devoted to beautiful wife, kids and grandkids. Looking forward to the time when every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord of all and that He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Obeying your conscience

  1. jhilgeman2 says:

    How does the rest of the world see Christians who loudly oppose the idea of any non-Christians treating THEIR religious law as above the federal law, and then turn around and say that it’s okay for Christians to do the same, in the name of exercising our right to religious freedom?

    Mike Huckabee asked why they didn’t imprison Gavin Newsom for essentially the same thing and he implied it was because Newsom wasn’t a Christian like Kim Davis and because he was doing something that people liked. In reality, Newsom was ordered to stop doing what he was doing by the courts, and he wasn’t imprisoned because he actually complied with the courts, while Kim Davis did not. If a Christian is told that they will be imprisoned if they do not execute the secular duties of a secular job (one that she chose to take) that is granted by the secular government, then why does that consequence suddenly turn into “persecution of Christianity” and the fear of “wholesale” persecution?

    To me, persecution implies that the receiving person has no choice nor participation in the matter, yet Kim Davis did. The only reason she was in her situation at all was because she willingly put herself into a job that ultimately asked her to do something she didn’t agree with. If she had a moral disagreement with what she was being asked to do, she had the option of resigning.

    The various examples in the Bible of defying the law are all people who had unreasonable, unforeseeable demands placed upon them, and in the case of the midwives, violated the entire intention of the jobs they had agreed to do.

    There is plenty of valid, serious Christian persecution around the world, but to me, Kim Davis does NOT fall into that category. This entire Kim Davis ordeal has been less about faith and more about winning votes for Mike Huckabee.

    There was also the case of a Muslim flight attendant who suddenly realized that she couldn’t serve alcohol anymore, because it would violate her faith, too. So what did she do? She asked someone else to do it for her, so she could keep her job while keeping her hands “clean.”

    Together, these people are painting a picture that keeping their current jobs (despite that the jobs ask them to do things that violate their faiths) is more important than their faith. Perhaps what these people SHOULD be asking themselves is whether or not they should be working at a place that even asks them to do things that are against their faith.

    Also, it seems to me that the biggest objectors to things like political correctness today are conservatives. They complain about the difficulties it presents in everyday life, but this seems like a road to adding “religious correctness” to everyday life. The article posted an image about Quakers objecting to gun permits, which is one good example. With the variety of things that are considered “religions” and their subsequent beliefs, it seems like putting religious beliefs above the law will only lead to a brittle and fractured society, full of people who will only do some parts of their jobs, or honor only some parts of their various types of contracts.

    I think it’s pretty important to recognize the difference between true persecution and a religious group trying to “win” at politics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s